Fadiman, Clifton. "A Fine American Novel." In Monteiro, George, ed. Critical
Essays on Ernest Hemingway's A
Farewell to Arms. New
York: G.K. Hall
& Co., 1994:81-83.
Fadiman summarizes critical views
that a modern[ist] novel can't show a "simple love affair," "male friendship,"
"true tragedy," nor be a "primitive novel." Yet Hemingway's A Farewell
to Arms does all four in "a remarkably beautiful book."
Though Catherine and Frederic's
love story is "gripping, almost heartbreaking," it shows Hemingway's use of
understatement. Though Frederic's friendship with Rinaldi could easily
have been presented lamely, it is instead "comradeship--nordically reticent
Henry . . . [and] blasphemously, ironically effusive . . . Rinaldi--was one of
the few things that mitigated the horror and stupidity of war."
Fadiman praises the
"non-intellectual" novel, driven by emotion and narrative rather than ideas by
"one of the best craftsmen alive," unlike the more self-conscious works of
Sherwood Anderson, for example. Seeing the irony of Frederic's simplistic
characterization of "good" frescoes as ones that are peeling, Fadiman hears a
slam at the more genteel protagonists of earlier novels.
So Fadiman sees three inter-twining motifs in the
story--love, comradeship, and the sickening war--and suggests the book should
win a Pulitzer Prize.